We are still dealing with a prostitute,
Mary Magdalene. Why is she so important to the Christian story? When
we discover her importance, we shall understand why she embarrasses
the old theology so much. Remember that she anoints Jesus and thereby
confers upon him the status of Christ. This is a ritual of profound
significance. It is a "kingmaking". When she is criticized
for using such an expensive ointment, Jesus upholds her authority,
at John 12:7,8. But that still does not explain why a woman is anointing
Jesus and why he allows her to do so. After all that was not Jewish
custom at the time.
Jesus and Mary Magdalene take part
in the IeroV
GamoV
(Ieros Gamos), the Sacred Wedding. The old theology carefully avoids
this issue because it is a pagan practice of the era that we are dealing
with. At this time in Palestine, a man is made a legitimate king if
he has sexual union with the High Priestess. He can only receive his
full divine power through the authority of the High Priestess. Without
her, his claim to kingship is invalid. The embarrassment of the Church
is obvious. We too feel embarrassed, because we have no concept of
sacred sexuality. This is not about physical sex, personal gratification
or eroticism. It is the belief that in the sacred marriage, the man
and woman become as gods and experience the divine. Thus the High
Priestess acting as a channel for the divine blesses the king and
confers authority upon him. The Sacred Wedding is the ultimate expression
of temple prostitution. The body of the Priestess is a metaphor for
the gateway to the gods.
Note carefully that in this belief
system, a man needs a woman to approach the gods, but a woman does
not need a man. She is in touch with the divine automatically. Hence
in the Quest for the Holy Grail, it said that although men must search
for the Grail, women already have it.
But we have not yet finished with
Mary Magdalene. In her day, the mystery schools of Osiris, Tammuz,
Dionysios, and Attis, had a rite that required the symbolic death
of the god, played by a priest. After three days, the Priestess in
the role of the goddess revives the god. During the ritual she says,
"They have removed my lord and I do not know where to find him."
Why is this relevant to the theology that we are developing? Read
John 20:2 where Mary Magdalene says:
They have taken away the Lord out
of the sepulchre, and we know not where they have laid him.
And again at 20:13 Mary Magdalene
tells the angels:
They have taken away my Lord, and
I know not where they have laid him.
Do you still doubt the importance
of Mary Magdalene? Clearly she is fulfilling the role of the High
Priestess. That is why she acts with authority and bestows the status
of Christ on Jesus; and that is why he allows her to do so in defiance
of Jewish custom. But there is more.

There is a modern view that the Wedding
in Cana (John 2:1-11) refers obliquely to the actual marriage of Jesus
and Mary Magdalene. Obviously, this is speculation but it makes sense
in the context of the Sacred Wedding. What happens in Cana? Jesus
and his disciples are "called" to the wedding. There he
participates by turning water into wine. In the parable of that era,
water symbolizes the human body and wine symbolizes the spirit, both
as vehicles of consciousness. By changing water into wine, Jesus transforms
consciousness from biological to spiritual. And what is a wedding?
It is the lawful union, according to kosmic law, of our male and female
natures. What about the soul? The diagram below makes the point clear.
It is a process of integration that places the soul as a vehicle of
consciousness, in its correct place.
Have we finished with Mary now? Not
quite. Remember we are dealing with the path that connects Goodness
with First Principle. This is the path of pain and sorrow. Upon this
path is the non-sphere of Knowledge. The gnostic myths tell us that
as an Aeon, Sofia desired to conceive but did so without
the concurrence of the masculine principle, that is the masculine
did not know her. Refer to Genesis 4:1 and recall
that Adam knew Eve and she conceived and gave birth. Sofia
did not act this way. She gave birth without the masculine and hence
this was a "virgin" birth. What was born? The Demiourgos
(Demiurge), the creator god who in turn created the kosmos, a kosmos
without Knowledge and therefore in need of redemption and a Redeemer.
However Sofia is above the Demiurge and he has no power over
her. That is why we can look to her for healing and salvation. We
need redemption and salvation. We need a Redeemer and through her
personification as the Virgin Mary, we have Him.
Mother
Now at last, we can consider the virgin
birth of Jesus. It is clear from Matthew 1:25, that Joseph did not
have sexual relations with Mary before she gave birth to her son.
We have already seen that the Greek word parthenos means "virgin".
We cannot avoid the issue.
If we look at the Tree of Life, we
are dealing with the letter F (fi)
and the element Air. It is the path connecting Glory and First
Principle. It is very appropriate as the third feminine step because
First Principle contains the pattern of order and Glory is the pattern
of salvation made manifest. Why else is Jesus born? He is the Redeemer
made manifest, who will lead us to salvation. The Tree is itself a
pattern of order and as we move along it, we see how it is consistent
with the theology we are developing.
It is easy enough to understand Mary
the mother of Jesus as the personification of the creative aspect
of Sofia. However this still does not explain the virgin birth
in terms we can comprehend. The path we are considering has attributed
to it the letter F (fi). This is the
first letter of the Greek word F
w V
(fos) which means "light". This word is used in six different
ways in the New Testament, but the meaning that is significant for
understanding the Virgin Birth is in John 8:12, where Jesus says,
Egw eimi to fwV tou kosmou ("I am
the light of the world"). We then compare that with John ch 1
v 3-5,
All things were made by him; and without
him was not any thing made that was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in the darkness; and the darkness comprehended
it not.
The key to the Virgin Birth is the
"light" that emanates from the masculine aspect that is
within the "life" of the First Principle. The "darkness"
is the feminine aspect of the First Principle. To make the point clearer,
the Tao is the differentiated unity of the "light"
masculine Yang and the "dark" feminine Yin.
Just as the Tao simply "is" according to Chinese
philosophy, in that manner the First Principle is "self-originate"
in the gnostic myth. Thus the true nature of the Virgin Birth lies
in the self-originated nature of the First Principle. At the end,
we see the Virgin Birth as a deep mystery that can only be understood
when we have travelled all the paths on the Tree of Life, with the
aid of the 12 spiritual disciplines.
The fundamental point is this: The
Mother is Sofia giving birth to the Redeemer.
*******
Let us review the first three steps
on the feminine journey by seeing them in the context of whole of
that journey.

The first step from Greatness to Goodness
leads directly into the second step from Goodness to First Principle.
So the Virgin Mary and Mary Magdalene follow in sequence. The third
step from Glory to First Principle is Mary the Mother. With the fourth
step, we shall see Mary as the Widow and finally with her Assumption,
Mary will be seen as the personification of Sofia.